that resulted in an educational agency or institution’s use of the photo or video for disciplinary action (or other official purposes) involving a student (or, if disciplinary action is pending or has not yet been taken, that would reasonably result in use of the photo or video for disciplinary action involving a student) ….The photo or video contains a depiction of an activity:.The educational agency or institution uses the photo or video for disciplinary action (or other official purposes) involving the student (including the victim of any such disciplinary incident).In reaching this decision, the Court cited to, and relied upon, the Unites States Department of Education’s online FAQs on Photos and Videos under FERPA (“Guidance”) which sets forth factors that should be considered in determining whether a photo or video is “directly related” to a student: The Supreme Court reversed the Commonwealth Court and held that while the video itself is a public record subject to disclosure, the images the video contains depicting the personally identifiable information of students – i.e., the students’ images on the video – are exempt from public disclosure pursuant to FERPA, and, therefore, also exempt from public disclosure under the RTKL. In the words of the Commonwealth Court: “ video … is only an educational record with respect to a student in the video for whom the video may have consequences.” Id. Instead, the Commonwealth Court found that the footage was “directly related” to the teacher whose behavior was at issue. The Commonwealth Court, however, concluded that the video was not an “education record” of the student within the meaning of FERPA, because, even though it captured individually identifiable images of students, it was not “directly related” to the students who were portrayed. § 1232g, and that if a record is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to FERPA it is also exempt from public disclosure under the RTKL. The school district denied the request on the basis that the recording was an educational record of the disciplined child under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (“FERPA”), 20 U.S.C. Requester submitted a request for records under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (“RTKL”) seeking a school bus surveillance video involving an elementary school teacher who, according to Requester, had roughly physically disciplined a child on a school bus outside of the school. Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that images of students in a school bus surveillance video are “educational records” under FERPA and must be redacted before releasing the video in respond to a request for records under the RTKL. If you wish to still access the information that you want to remove, it is advisable that you make a copy of your document before you redact your document.Christopher L. Note: Redacting Word document is permanent and cannot be undone. Below are steps showing how to completely redact text in Word document. Completely redact text in Word documentīefore you distribute your documents to others or to the public in general, it is important that you hide some information that is private or confidential. Both are straightforward, and I'll show them to you in the next section. To redact in a Word document, you can follow two methods. Thanks to this procedure, you can ensure that the content you want to hide will not be seen by anyone other than you. Redacting a Word document tries to hide text or images and prevent third parties from using software or techniques to "uncover" what is not visible. Best PDF Redaction Tool for Redacting in PDF Files
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |